Amy Lynch-Biniek
  • Home
  • About
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Indianapolis Resolution
  • Background on the Indianapolis Resolution
  • Blog
  • Forum: Issues About Part-Time and Contingent Faculty
  • Open Words Special Issue

Ramblings after too much coffee

Advocating with NTF in your department: MLA 2020

1/8/2020

 
At MLA 2020, I'll be hosting a workshop with Carolyn Betensky and Jennifer Ruth, "Fighting exploitation of contingent faculty from within: How tenure-stream allies can help to create equity on campus." We'll each speak briefly about specific context for advocacy before helping audience members to brainstorm and problem solve.
I'll be speaking about departmental-level work.  Below, you can read the notes for my talk and see my slides.


Advocacy in the Department

As my colleagues have established, advocating for equity is work. Tweeting and publishing on these issues are good steps, but they don’t amount to much without the work, without striving to take action on our campuses and in our organizations. 

So, I want to take a moment to acknowledge that we are encouraging you to do more work, when you may already feel overwhelmed. I can’t help but think of Nancy Welch’s chapter, “First-Year Writing and the Angels of Austerity” in the excellent Composition in​  the Age of Austerity​. She argues that austerity measures more and more mean that “the work of education” is performed by angels in in austerity’s architecture,” (137) without compensation or recognition. This is largely true of the work of labor advocacy.
[Slide 2] But if you’re here, you are interested in doing that work. So thank you. 

If you are new to this work, it can seem overwhelming. Department-based initiatives might be the best way to begin, in familiar territory. Here are a few guiding principles for the first-time advocate. 

  1. Listen first. [Slide 3]
The first step is to work with and not speak for, contingent faculty--allies should never assume that they know what NTT faculty want, need, or feel. Moreover, an ally’s work is not to “save” contingent faculty, but to use the resources at her disposal to aid them in speaking to power and organizing for change. I highly recommend my friend Seth Kahn’s chapter “The Problem of Speaking for Adjuncts” in our collection Contingency, Exploitation,and Solidarity. (That sounds like a shameless plug, but Seth really is very wise. You can read it for free online, too.)

So, talk to your NTT colleagues. Depending on the size of the faculty and other constraints, you might: visit them individually during their office hours; ask to buy them a coffee; ask if you can attend a meeting of any existing contingent faculty committees or organizations. You might also use an anonymized poll, though this requires that you establish trust and intent, usually by putting in facetime with the faculty first anyway. 

Questions you might ask: 
  • What are the challenges you face in the department? 
  • What policies or practices make your work more difficult? 
  • What would you like to see changed? 
  • How would you like tenure-line faculty to help? 

When you listen to critiques of your department, your academic home, sometimes you will nod in agreement or want to shout “Amen!” But know that you will also inevitably feel defensive at times, too. As in some creative writing workshop pedagogies, try to listen silently to the critique. It’s good for you, I promise. 

2. Choose a widely-felt, winnable issue and make a game plan. [Slide 4]
In this section, I’m borrowing from the excellent Secrets of a Successful Organizer, from Labor Notes. (The Labor Notes website and training sessions are very worth a visit, by the way.)   
  • With your contingent and tenure-line allies, identify an issue that most of your NTT faculty in the dpt care about. Moreover, you can start with a small but important issue--you don’t have to take on the entire structure of higher education the first time out of the gate. Starting with something you can win generates both trust and momentum.  E.g.: improved office space, input on text book choices, changes in scheduling. 
  • Identify potential solutions. Labor Notes tells us: “It’s amazing how far along folks can be in a campaign without having identified the solution they’re after...” (138). For example, you might identify unused locations in your buildings for improved office spaces; make a list of the texts that NTT faculty would like to see approved; analyze the department’s scheduling practices to determine how all faculty might be more equitably accommodated. 
  • Identify who has the power to fix the problem. On the department level, the answer is usually some subset of the tenure-line faculty. Identify who in the department are the key decision-makers and influencers. 
  • Discuss which tactics are likely to be effective with these decision-makers.  To get buy-in from your department, your potential solutions should be “clear and credible” (139). As Carolyn mentioned, talking to stakeholders one-on-one can make a huge difference. Large faculty meetings allow people to stay silent or can be dominated by a few personalities. Build support before bringing items to a whole department meeting for discussion or vote.  

3. Build recognition of & respect for the professionalism of NTT colleagues. [Slide5] 
In my own department, colleagues and I worked for a long time to push back against the idea that NTT = less: less scholarly, less professional, less accomplished. The snobbery of some tenure-line faculty who believe that their pedagogical insights are more learned or their scheduling priorities more important because of employment status no longer surprises me; I’ve also accepted that it’s a snobbery the academy teaches us; we perpetuate this attitude. Just as we have to help FYC students unlearn the five paragraph essay, we have to help tenure-line faculty unlearn the notion that, say, the adjunct who has been teaching FYC for 15 years doesn’t have enough professional insight to provide useful input into textbook choices or curricular design. We can address strategies for doing this as need be. 

4. Revise or clarify department and departmental committee bylaws and other rules. [Slide 6]

Where rules are exclusionary, vague, or ripe for abuse, propose revisions.
 
For instance, at KU, our contract indicated that “departments will establish a procedure” for the rollover of NTT positions. For years, the “procedure” was really an informal decision of the chair. Instead, we outlined a procedure that NTT faculty helped develop; took comments & suggestions for revision; then held a successful vote to put it into practice. 

5. Fight for funding. [Slide 7]
 While battles on the department-level often won’t affect per course payments or benefits, we can advocate for material compensation in small but meaningful ways.  How about dividing up departmental professional travel funds among all faculty? Or using some professional development funds to pay NTT faculty for committee work? 

6. Don’t be afraid of a little protest. [Slide8]
Attending a session of the CWPA this past summer, a comrade at a large R1 in the southeast described a tactic she used in her department to great effect. In every meeting at which she was slated to speak, whatever the topic, she would display a slide behind her as she spoke, simply listing the salary of FYC faculty, all of whom are NTT. She might have been talking about an upcoming student club event, a new course, anything, and they were all reminded of the low salary of their most vulnerable colleagues, teaching the foundational course. The worst she suffered was rolled eyes--she is tenured, after all, and this is one thing that tenure’s good for. She tells me that the departmental advisory committee (made up of TT faculty) and the dean are now all on board for increasing salaries; they await decisions about the state budget to be made in the legislature. 


Works Cited
Bradbury, Alexandra, Mark Brenner, and Jane Slaughter. Secrets of a Successful Organizer. Labor Notes / Labor Education & Research Project, 2016

Kahn, Seth. “The Problem of Speaking for Adjuncts.” Contingency, Exploitation,and Solidarity: Labor and Action in English Composition. The WAC Clearinghouse/ University Press of Colorado, 2017.

Welch, Nancy. “First-Year Writing and the Angels of Austerity.” Composition in the Age of Austerity. Eds. Nancy Welch & Tony Scott. Utah State University Press, 2016. 



alb_mla_2020.pptx
File Size: 271 kb
File Type: pptx
Download File


Comments are closed.

    Author

    Oh, my. That's me.

    Archives

    December 2020
    July 2020
    January 2020
    January 2019
    March 2018
    March 2017
    October 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    August 2015
    July 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014

    Categories

    All
    Higher Ed
    Teaching

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • About
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Indianapolis Resolution
  • Background on the Indianapolis Resolution
  • Blog
  • Forum: Issues About Part-Time and Contingent Faculty
  • Open Words Special Issue